Bite Mark Analysis: Procedure and Protocol

 

<script async custom-element="amp-auto-ads"

        src="https://cdn.ampproject.org/v0/amp-auto-ads-0.1.js">

</script>

                        

                         courtesy photo
 

<amp-auto-ads type="adsense"

        data-ad-client="ca-pub-2387690130010463">

</amp-auto-ads>

Introduction
Bite mark analysis is a forensic method used to identify individuals based on the patterns left by their teeth on a victim, object, or other surfaces. While controversial due to questions of scientific reliability, bite mark analysis continues to be utilized in forensic investigations in certain cases. This article outlines a unique and comprehensive procedure and protocol for bite mark analysis to ensure compliance with forensic standards, minimize biases, and maintain the integrity of evidence.

Procedure for Bite Mark Analysis

1. Scene and Evidence Documentation

   • Photograph the Bite Mark: Use high-resolution forensic photography. Include scales and reference points for accurate measurement.
     • Use oblique lighting to highlight texture and detail.
     • Capture images at multiple angles.
   • Cast the Bite Mark (if on malleable material): Create a 3D mold using dental casting material such as silicone or polyvinyl siloxane.
   • Preserve the Tissue: If the bite mark is on human skin, use specialized photography techniques such as ultraviolet (UV) or infrared imaging to reveal sub-surface bruising.
   • Record the time and condition of the bite mark to assess potential distortion over time due to healing or decomposition.

2. Victim Examination

   • Inspect the wound for evidence of a bite, distinguishing between human and non-human marks.
   • Document the healing stage and appearance of the wound.
   • Swab the area for biological evidence, such as saliva, to test for DNA.

3. Suspect Identification

   • Collect dental impressions of the suspect(s). Ensure the use of non-invasive dental impression techniques to capture both upper and lower dentition.
   • Obtain high-resolution photographs of the suspect's teeth and bite alignment.

4. Comparison of Evidence

   • Overlay Method: Compare the suspect’s dental impressions and bite mark using transparent overlays.
   • Computer-Assisted Analysis: Use forensic software to align, measure, and analyze the bite mark for matching features.
     • Look for specific features, such as the size, shape, gaps, and alignment of teeth.
   • Verification of Match: Compare the curvature of the arches, the angulation of bites, and any unique characteristics (e.g., missing or broken teeth).

5. Peer Review

   • Involve independent forensic experts to review the findings for confirmation. This reduces bias and improves reliability.

Protocol for Bite Mark Analysis

1. Chain of Custody

   • Maintain strict chain-of-custody documentation from the collection of evidence to the final report.
   • Ensure all handling and storage of evidence is compliant with legal and forensic standards.

2. Standardized Documentation

   • Record all observations, procedures, and findings in a forensic logbook.
   • Provide a detailed written report, including photographic evidence and analysis.

3. Ethical Practices

   • Avoid over-reliance on subjective assessments.
   • Clearly report limitations of the analysis to prevent overstating the reliability of findings.

4. Use of Advanced Technology

   • Integrate modern technologies such as 3D imaging, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning algorithms to improve accuracy.
   • Use software capable of minimizing distortion errors caused by skin elasticity and movement.

5. Training and Certification

   • Analysts must be trained in forensic odontology and certified by a recognized body, such as the American Board of Forensic Odontology (ABFO).
   • Regular proficiency testing should be conducted to maintain skill levels and compliance with new developments.

6. Compliance with Standards

   • Follow guidelines established by professional organizations, such as the ABFO and International Association for Identification (IAI), to ensure scientific rigor.
   • Ensure all methods used meet the Daubert Standard (or equivalent in non-U.S. jurisdictions), which requires evidence to be based on valid scientific methodology.

7. Transparency and Reporting

   • Provide full transparency about methodologies, including any assumptions or potential error rates.
   • Include disclaimers regarding the controversial nature of bite mark analysis and its limitations.

<amp-auto-ads type="adsense"

        data-ad-client="ca-pub-2387690130010463">

</amp-auto-ads>

Conclusion

Bite mark analysis requires meticulous adherence to standardized procedures and protocols to ensure its scientific validity and credibility in a legal setting. By integrating advanced technology, maintaining ethical practices, and subjecting findings to peer review, forensic experts can enhance the reliability of bite mark analysis. However, practitioners must remain transparent about its limitations and seek corroborative evidence to strengthen forensic investigations.